In a global economy, many goods, including what we use on a daily basis, are transported from other countries in a long distance. To what extent do you think its benefits exceed its drawbacks?

In this era of globalization and world trade and business, it seems to be a rise in importing daily commodities which have to be travelled to a long distance before reaching to consumers. Although there are still several drawbacks, the potential advantages they bring are quite overwhelming.
On the one hand, it should be admitted that there are a wealth of disadvanteges come with imported products. First and foremost, less demand for local merchandise means fewer job opportunities for the locals, which not only increases unemployment rate but also contributes to a drastic reduction in the community interaction between consumers and domestic providers. As a result, people struggle to make ends meet and it might cause an increase in society's vices and crime rate. If the indigenous labor force is utilized thoroughly, crimes are less likely to happen. Furthermore, due to the inclusion of imported taxes and logistic costs, products from foreign countries are prohibitively expensive in comparision with the local ones. This allows a large amount of Vietnamese currency to flow abroad.
On the other hand, delivering goods oversea provides humans with various benefits. Initially, some countries are better for agriculture, some for industrial productions such as mining industry or food processing and some others for technologies. Thus, importing and exporting allows inhabitants of each nation to enjoy a variety of products that cannot be manufactured in their country, which really satisfies their needs. For instance, about a decade ago, Vietnamese hardly saw blueberry fruit which is from European countries but thanks to the global trade, it now has a palce in every fruit stand. Secondly, as the nations have been intensifying the import and export, the economic cooperation and development and diplomatic relations among them will become closer. This not only fosters the prosperity of the national economy but also reduces the incidence of armed conflicts. If countries are independent upon one another’s economy, frays would be more likely with the antagonistic relationship between the United States and Iran is a typical example.
In summary, although importing goods has both negative and positive consequences, its merits far exceed its demerits.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48579545455 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0176379212 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642045454545 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0464942045 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6875 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.090167879238 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0253015676633 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035615904018 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652588410016 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410840646045 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.