The government and individuals are spending too much money on national celebrations like new year or festivals. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by some that both the government and individuals themselves have been wasting a huge amount of money on organizing national events, namely new year or festivals. In my opinion, i partly concur with this notion.
On the one hand, there are two reasons why celebrating events having the scope of a country should be invested. Firstly, organizing those festivals could be synonymous with constructing an utopia. Specifically, an ideal society exists in a place, where all its inhabitants have joys and feel chirpy with their lives. It is undeniable that vibrant parties can make people cheery and have a motivation to concentrate on their works after the events. Secondly, the national celebrations could become one of tourist attractions, which could benefit the economy of countries immensely. For instance, the 50th anniversary of National Day of Singapore attracted a host of travelers, the celebrations lasted for a month and brought a huge amount of foreign currency for the country.
On the other hand, the government should take into consideration to spend too much national budget on the celebrations. The fact is that apart from parties, there are many fields which need the investment of the government. Public facilities is a case in a point. They play a fundamental role in residents’ lives since citizens have to use them on a daily basis, therefore, the government should allocate funding on them. Additionally, in lieu of spending much on amusement, the authority would subsidize people residing in poor condition to enhance the quality of their lives to some extent.
In conclusion, i hang onto a notion that celebrating national could have manifold positive impacts on people’s lives, however, spending a great deal of money on those is unnecessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s could be synonymous with constructing an utopia. Specifically, an ideal society ...
^^
Line 13, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...es to some extent. In conclusion, i hang onto a notion that celebrating nat...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27083333333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04692396684 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3399704051 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.428571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208127638758 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597074294316 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793297407931 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130905304053 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537515763014 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.