Every government is responsible for fulfilling the basic needs of the people. After making people satisfied with their basic needs for entertainment purposes, the government spends money to build up theaters and make other sorts of entertainment programs. Some believe that this is nothing but a waste of money, in place of the authorities who should invest money to upgrade their public facilities. I do not completely agree with this statement. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss that.
On the one hand, arts and music give people mental satisfaction. Musical institutions do not have enough opportunities like other public institutions to earn revenue, therefore the government should give them funds to carry on their research and study. Moreover, music, arts highlight the cultural tradition and the identity of a nation. Without being given financial help in this sector, cultural traditions will be diminished in the country. In addition, in many countries, the entertainment industry adds a huge amount of money to the GDP. For instance, in America, the film industry provides 20% of the total GDP, and in India, the percentage is much higher than this value. Therefore, the government should invest more to get more revenue.
On the other hand, to make strong and well infrastructure public services the expenditure of money should be increased. For example, a well-organized public transportation system which will be very helpful for decreasing the traffic jams and the suffering of the people. Then, to ensure the safety of the people, the government should spend money to make a strong task force and install cameras and other items to monitor every movement. Furthermore, the government should be concerned about environmental pollution and try to reduce it to get a good environment to live in.
In conclusion, basic facilities and entertainment both are needed in our life, we can not give more priority to one instead of the other. To sum up all the points above, I can say we should spend equal money in every sector.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18018018018 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95724599288 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54954954955 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6317855104 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293040612352 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890884254887 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771760587519 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167534440387 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971740036774 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.