Folks, commonly, argue that allocating a handsome of national revenue to arts in pointless and merely a waste of money, hence the authority should spend more budget on general infrastructure. In this essay, I personally intend to elaborate my disapproval of this motion, hence distributing money to either arts and public instruments must be vitally equivalent.
First of all, investment in right sector, is an imperative factor for thriving society. However, many believe incorporating national budget merely into a sector which is pointless. For illustrate, the sector which not relate with economic prosperity. I comprehensively advice that although arts are soft skill as well as notably minute things actually that can immensely escalate the senses of intellectual and highly clever indivual. Regardless improving other economic sector which relating with it.
In contrast, improving public infrastructure is an crucial factor to uplift public joyfulness. Moreover, people are able easily to do daily activity such as going to work, that will get helped by when transportation is suffice. This does not imply, that improving public tools are first and foremost aspect, but it depends on other elements, such as music and theatre. Well-known famous people usually come from creative of arts. Noticeable influencer of society is artist. Sometime show of drama or poet become best criticism to the authority. None of arts similar with the authority without supervisor that it lead to arbitrary of irresposible law.
To sum up, flourishing public instruments possess numerous virtues, so is investing in arts. As a result, the government should pay more attention and allocate national money fairly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... not relate with economic prosperity. I comprehensively advice that although arts are soft skill as we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ast, improving public infrastructure is an crucial factor to uplift public joyfuln...
^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sufficed'.
Suggestion: sufficed
...ll get helped by when transportation is suffice. This does not imply, that improving pu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'become the best'.
Suggestion: become the best
... artist. Sometime show of drama or poet become best criticism to the authority. None of art...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52671755725 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98814743865 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656488549618 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6461266895 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233217822551 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577326143177 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556723570836 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13009740407 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054774732374 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.