A glance at the chart provided reveal the percentage of worldwide land degradation, while the table shows the proportion of causes of land deprived that measured by region (namely North America, Europe and the region in Ocenia) in 1990.
It is apparent that the first trend why land degradation occured because of clearing a land for over-grazing that contributed 35 per cent and the least contributor was other aspect. The other sectors that had responsible were clearing trees --deforastation and over-cultivation for farming purposes that both aspects placed second below animal ranch needs around 28 per cent and 30 per cent.
The percentage of deprived land also measured by region it took place that can be seen in the table provided. The region with the biggest land degraded was Europe with 23 per cent overall respectively with the higher in deforestation, 7.7 over-cultivation, amd 5.5 over-grazing. The second region was Oceania with 13 per cent and North America was the lowest level around 5 per cent.
To sum up, not suprisingly, over-grazing was the biggest contributor of causes of low-level land while Oceania took the first place because of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...that can be seen in the table provided. The region with the biggest land degraded w...
^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...over-cultivation, amd 5.5 over-grazing. The second region was Oceania with 13 per c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16842105263 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99850378201 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0043081838 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.285714286 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109567553186 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598795073449 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509520805584 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791381735617 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554534313787 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.