It is clear as a indivual or even a nation in this era that human act could be implied as an action of devastation to the flora and fauna. For this reason, while some people argue that this trend is allowing for some extent, others suggest that the act of this should be replaced in order to change.
Human actions such as mining could be a drawbacks to the habitant which ecosystem of various species will be impacted. Drilling mountain for coal mining purposes or cutting trees in huge scale regarding open field in order to fullfill nation’s necessities is more likely one of the most contributor of endangered species become more vulnerable. Moreover, for salient example, Orang Utan in Borneo, are hardly to find because of hunting and deforestating, and the wheel has distrubed. However, I tend that the human deed such this must be replaced with actions that eco-friendly.
On the other hand, although some actions of human activies could be justified of the thriving of nation economic, some others movement could be seen as an drastic remedy to put new changing in term of saving creatures in the world. For instace, with changing dependence of mining, reneweable energy is become alternative; therefore protecting jungle and enviroment, and more enviromental-friendly. Additionally, it is also beneficial if human act such as illegal fishing is changing to the marine cultures.
To sum up, eventhough human activitiy which negatively effect plants and animals is seemingly understanding, some other measure could be adressed as alternatives and benefits both human itself and the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
It is clear as a indivual or even a nation in this era t...
^
Line 2, column 39, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a drawback' or simply 'drawbacks'?
Suggestion: a drawback; drawbacks
... Human actions such as mining could be a drawbacks to the habitant which ecosystem of vari...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...f the thriving of nation economic, some others movement could be seen as an drastic re...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
..., some others movement could be seen as an drastic remedy to put new changing in t...
^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ch negatively effect plants and animals is seemingly understanding, some other measure could be adressed a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1877394636 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02807578583 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5021052165 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255754886862 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101131882112 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820732559319 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167007441424 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047811834327 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.