The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
Since the 20th century, multiple countries have been strengthening their involvement in various sectors of human life. An opinion exists that capital spending in the entertainment area is an insufficient splurge compared to the support of the community segment. Although I believe that artistry is important, senior officials should spend more money on improving people's lives through utility maintenance.
Firstly, literature, performances and cinematics obviously enable better comprehension of the cultural values in a specific country. Visual and audio cases enhance the education process and present historical facts in a new fascinating way. For example, my cousin always enjoyed watching documentaries and reading historical books that helped him to get a job in the famous Lenin library. Thus, the support of civilized values helps individuals to learn more about the homeland, which is an important factor in educating children.
Secondly, state health and safety facilities should be developed in order to provide people with modern medicine and a sense of security. Recently the country’s global image has been highly rated based on competency to prioritize the community field. For example, Germany is acknowledged for its great healthcare, which attracts adults from all over the world to go for treatment. Thus, the successful development of social sphere is an integral part of a strong and stable policy.
Taking everything into consideration, investments in art, music, and theater could be beneficial for the community, and the government's advocacy of public services is vital. The wellness and well-being of citizens directly depend on the timely actions of the authorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...e beneficial for the community, and the governments advocacy of public services is vital. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64453125 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02897133667 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6953125 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.636613639 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.153846154 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100785039671 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292527743242 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769528648464 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652425099884 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853545096486 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.