It is important to consider whether government should invest money on scientific subjects or reserve money for other subjects as well. Since science directly helps in the advancement of a country, some people are of the opinion that government should spend its entire resources only on science instead of other subjects. In my opinion, it should equally distribute its budget as other subjects like arts and history are necessary for the all-round development of a child.
To begin with, there is no doubt that science has blessed us with so many benefits. In other words, it has facilitated our lives in every way possible, which has enabled us to enjoy a better standard of life. To clarify, medical science has invented cures of many diseases that are considered to be fatal a few decades earlier, whereas engineering science has grant us the ability to construct buildings, bridges and industries through the application of technology. Needless to say, these have brought so many changes to our lives that it is hard to imagine a single day without using the scientific appliances. Therefore, it is reasonable to allocate fund for imparting the knowledge of science to students. However, this does not mean that government can ignore the importance of other subjects.
Despite learning science subjects, students need to have equal ideas about other subjects for their overall development. This is because science cannot provide the knowledge of arts and history to the students, which are undeniably the core subjects to ensure the progression of a nation. To elaborate, art helps the student not only to ignite their curiosities but also to find out their hidden potential, while history enlightens them with the information of their past and the foundation upon which a nation stands. Without acquiring such knowledge, a student cannot expect to excel in life regardless of how much command they have over scientific subjects. If government had decided to spend money on science only, then the students would have failed to learn about their culture, tradition and their origin through art and history.
In conclusion, after analyzing the above discussion, it is quite evident that a child needs the idea of both science and other subjects for prospering in life. Thus, I think that government should devise a plan for ensuring the equal distribution of financial support to science and other subjects as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16497461929 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73090903459 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4924014946 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.1875 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237986003233 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875249797421 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663284805025 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162420172387 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662221327927 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.