There is an argument that to develop a nation, science education should be invested with higher amount of money rather than other disciplines. I, personally, strongly disagree with this statement because each subject contributes equally to the development of the country.
On the one hand, state budget should be spent partially on science education because of several undeniable reasons. Firstly, science education is responsible for training employees for all other fields of a nation. If workforce is highly intellectually trained, they can positively contribute to field they are working on, resulting in the development of the country. For example, North American and European economies have been boosted significantly because their workers are trained from top world universities. Secondly, people working on science education are capable of inventing labor-saving devices or methods that can be really helpful to other subjects. For instance, engineers invent calculators to assist officers process a massive amount of data in a faster and more accurate way. This will lead to an enhancement in labor productivity, and, therefore, contribute considerably to the country’s progress towards development.
On the other hand, many other subjects than science education play essential roles to the development of a country and governments should allocate money to these fields. For example, subjects such as art, music or literature, have important impacts on the development of children because these subjects teach them to become well-rounded people. As a result, youngsters, the driving force of a nation, will be aware of their roles in the development of their own country when they get older. History, as another example, has a very important role when a nation wants to be developed. Through historical eras, people learn how to deal with difficult problems or unexpected events occurred in the past as well as gain valuable experiences from ancestors and apply them in modern life.
In conclusion, from various reasons I mentioned above, governments should equally spend money on science education and other subjects as well to develop the country in a comprehensive way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a comprehensive way" with adverb for "comprehensive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...subjects as well to develop the country in a comprehensive way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54166666667 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02371578407 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568452380952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1131127386 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.133333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334462043937 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111663106406 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114951050355 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250299181876 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128882475324 0.056905535591 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.