The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often considered by some government that, national enhancement and growth seems to be carried out by teaching subject like science rather than other academic syllabus. However, in this essay disagree with the statement because a countries development could be achieved not only by learning science but also remaining subjects like maths, history, arts and so on.
Initially, progress of a country include neither scientific nor cultural, social, geographical. In brief, government should preserve money for arts, sports, and mathematical subjects as well, which may gave an outcome with sustainable and reliable manner. For instance, irrespective of mathematical subject budget would lead to economical and financial decline to the core. Similarly, students who have loss of knowledge regarding social and geographical subjects also diminish the well being and relation with neighboring countries. Moreover, lack of expense for the survival of arts and linguistic subjects would lead to detrimental effect on overall sustainability of a nation.
Not to be outdone, science subjects may interconnected with other academic syllabus such as, many scientific calculation and remarks are contributed to maths and social structures. Demanding more money for science may alter the exact outcome of fewer scientific researches to some extent. Owing to the fact that, getting more allowance for science subjects may change the teachers and students attitudes towards studies and projects which would impact in countries development. For example, extra payment for science would lead to rush in like subject, and thereby mitigate the alternate subjects and may lead to unemployment and poverty to the core.
To sum up, government must distribute money for every subjects rather consider certain subject preference. National development attributed by many factors and donations from various subjects which is inevitable for students academia and countries well being.
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.summaris the information by selecting and repairing the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below provides information on rental charges and salaries in three areas of London.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 55
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 48
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...y disagree with the statement because a countries development could be achieved not only ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, in brief, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75342465753 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92944172555 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.070004788 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.230769231 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31202503397 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112264439104 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442774512486 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190923182783 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243264556239 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.