Government should spend money on adult people who cannot read and write rather than young people.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is sometimes argued that government donate lack of money for older people. However, there are those who believe that national organization must give their cash for students. In my opinion, ministry might invest their capital to young people, also they can put in their bank to adult people. Firstly, this essay will discuss the possible effects from donating money to old people, and secondly, it will analyze potential aftermath of giving cash to student’s life.
On the one hand, opponents of adult people believe that in future they cannot bring possible benefits. The reason for this is that pensioners will lose their positive qualities, like reading, writing, but they will bring their brilliant experience. As a result, politics might waste their cash, which they can donate for needed organizations. However, this argument is flawed mainly because of adult’s age, and their irresponsibility to develop themselves. A prime example is China, where authority spend lack of their bank for adult people while they have a productive country with good skills of people in the long run.
On the other hand, proponents of successful future base their opinion of the assumption that state must invest their cash to young people and I agree that students will improve their skills and bring more benefits. This is because of their age and developing their skills in other aspects of life. As a consequence, they will open new discoveries, and they will look for possible solutions of the planet’s problems. For example, according to recent research of Harvard university, they found that actually, 16 to 21 teenagers brings into the world more discoveries than others.
In conclusion, though people may vary in their opinions, I am firmly convinced that authority must spend their lack of cash for the future exactly for young people. This is due to the fact that teenagers may make impact in our life by their true actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that actually, 16 to 21 teenagers brings into the world more discoveries than ot...
^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...6 to 21 teenagers brings into the world more discoveries than others. In concl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15141955836 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66602389862 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542586750789 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3745546712 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.866666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145195423172 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058155831482 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050742035466 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102890022864 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619564617367 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.