As urban and regional development continue being a crucial factor to the growth of a country and thus its people, how governments utilize funding for public infrastructures, such as roads and railways, is a closely observed discussion. Some argue that governments should invest more in rail transport rather than roads. I completely agree with this proposal.
Firstly, rail transportation is more efficient than roads. Train has the largest capacity compared to other modes of transport and can carry hundreds of people and tons of goods. If more people were to be able to travel on trains, it would drastically reduce traffic congestion and the toxic exhaust fumes that have long been associated with transportations. Secondly, locomotive tracks can be used for multiple purposes and can greatly add to the movement of humans, animals, and goods from one location to another.
However, the argument for roads seems to suggest that having personal vehicles would be much more convenient to use. This is not the case. Even though people would have more personal space on their own cars, traveling by train let people spend their commuting time attending to their own business at no risk of traffic collision. It has been confirmed by multiple kinds of research that distraction and intoxication while driving is the leading cause of fatal traffic accidents. Railways are much more reliable compared to roads for this.
To conclude, railway development is imperative for the development of any society, as it is safer, more efficient and convenient than roads. Governments should subsidize more on rails.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28015564202 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84960950689 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6400471759 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159050317589 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664079857785 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049817372708 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108307678243 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044048382632 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.