In the overwhelming age of new technology and media, personal health is of great importance. Some employers think that by subsidizing gym and sports clubs membership, they can create a healthier and therefore more effective working force. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. The following essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages in these arguments.
The former group of employers implies that by having gym membership correlate to their employees becoming healthier. It is true that an hour or two at the gym can increase your serotonin and adrenaline levels substantially. These naturally occurring hormones, which are released whenever someone exerts energy - by working out, for instance, are the driving forces of human behaviour by creating a euphoric feeling. This can possibly lead to the employees being happier and more efficient at their work. At the same time, by creating a bond between the employees, for example from playing in a team sport or working out together, the employers can make the workplace more comfortable and less stressful.
On the other hand, making an investment toward the well-being of the workforce is not a practical idea for many employers. They are reluctant to calculate the risk of putting their funds into something so abstract and may not pay off in the long term. Moreover, a person doesn't get healthier by simply having a gym membership, if they don't participate in the programs. The only way of making sure everyone go to the gym is by making it a required past-time. There are many other ways to keep track of a person's health that doesn't equate to them having to go to the gym or to a sports meeting. Making something like going to the gym compulsory can bring about more troubles than its worth for the latter group.
Personally, I consider the gym a healthy and enjoyable way to spend my time. But I wouldn't expect it of everyone, nor should employers. This is why it is not necessary to subsidize gym or sports membership.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...ur by creating a euphoric feeling. This can possibly lead to the employees being happier and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ff in the long term. Moreover, a person doesnt get healthier by simply having a gym me...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...simply having a gym membership, if they dont participate in the programs. The only w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... are many other ways to keep track of a persons health that doesnt equate to them havin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... to keep track of a persons health that doesnt equate to them having to go to the gym ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...d enjoyable way to spend my time. But I wouldnt expect it of everyone, nor should emplo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93768545994 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82095278013 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581602373887 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9878067835 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351319527414 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10534877158 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974949100078 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20168749228 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784462017651 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.