Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
More recently, there has been some controversy as to whether the government should release funds on improving the quality of the railway or it should be channel towards road. Personally, I agree with this notion.
There are some compelling reasons why I think the railway should be funded. Firstly, it causes less environmental clithches. This is because rail lines are usually far from the city, thereby not causing any form of air pollution including traffic congestion. Also, it is a safe route and it accommodates more commuters with their luggages. The capacity of a train can take thousands of people at once including business men and women with their goods. For example, a cousin friend usually travel to the east from the far north in other to purchase gold and fabrics using the train because of its safety and space. Hence, the state should consider spending more in order to improve the state of the railways.
Others might argue and say the government should rather channel the money towards working on road. Proponents of this claim that cars can reach everywhere including links between different facilities that need visiting. For instance, when one alight at a train station, there will still be need to board a car or motorcycle to the exact destination. However, I tend to disagree with this because there is now invention of electric train that are environmentally friendly, such that their stations can be situated near shopping malls, schools and offices.
In conclusion, I believe that allocating more funds for the betterment of locomotives will make transportation more safe and convenient than cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...cently, there has been some controversy as to whether the government should release funds on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'channeled', 'channelled'?
Suggestion: channeled; channelled
... quality of the railway or it should be channel towards road. Personally, I agree with ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers with their luggages. The capacity of a train can take thousands of people at ...
^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and women with their goods. For example, a cousin friend usually travel to the ea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14606741573 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.732347713 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7412866689 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135071255125 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452625039812 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583601020797 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826050672996 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468423131778 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.