Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Increasing sales rate of reigning consumer goods recently shows the advertising effects, not as if it is really useful to the buyers. In my view, I completely agree with this notion, as this result in many people buying what is not needed and wasting funds or necessarily.
The advertising system these days have put many people into purchasing several things not useful to them, this is believed to be as a result of how well they want to impress the public with their brand by convincing them with logical advert. For example, it is observed in the market today that there are several product selling fast due to the commercial seen on television today such as cooking seasonings which will later get expired in the kitchen cabinet when not used.
Furthermore, it is often claimed that commercials make people spend more than necessary. This is sometimes because of the pictures attached to the product which makes it fascinating but the content might not what is this happens in big shopping malls mostly. For instance, it was observed in the ever-busy shopping mall in Nigeria (Shoprite) that most imported goods bought such as chesse for children are more or less a waste of money. Relatively, family outing to this area makes them spend more than expected.
In conclusion, reigning consumer goods selling fast in recent time shows the power of display and not necessarily the human need. In my opinion, I totally agree with this as it makes the public buying unnecessary things and wasting financial resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'products'?
Suggestion: products
...the market today that there are several product selling fast due to the commercial seen...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re or less a waste of money. Relatively, family outing to this area makes them sp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, really, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9765625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54931822994 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5859375 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9308193658 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144522854294 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566652240313 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471571735667 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962135697922 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456238537945 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.