Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The status of our present day environment can only be worked on via government's intervention as well as help from industries as individuals do not have the capacity. While I understand this claim, I would argue that individuals can also be of help.
It is often argued that only higher authorities and big industries can improve our surroundings. On the side of the companies, proponents of this claim that they can be of help by constructing their factories far away from residents which will help prevent emission of poisonous substances such as carbon monoxide. As an illustration,dwellers will be free from frequent chest infection (pneumonia) when its source have been moved away. Also, it is believed that the state should enact a rule of banning deforestation, as this appears to boost the oxygen saturation of the atmosphere, together with availability of food and medicine. If deforestation continues, the community will not have much of the valuable forestry.
However,I tend to disagree that residents do not have the capacity to improve their immediate surroundings and there are convincing arguments for this. Firstly, this is all about their life. If they lack knowledge of it at first, they would be sensitized and properly informed about the effect of poor or unsafe domain. For instance, people now dig holes to bury their refuse instead of their normal open dumping method after a campaign exercise against polio virus.
In conclusion, it seems to me that individuals can make much contribution in order to have a conducive environment as they are always the first contact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , dwellers
...h as carbon monoxide. As an illustration,dwellers will be free from frequent chest infect...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tation continues, the community will not have much of the valuable forestry. ...
^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...h of the valuable forestry. However,I tend to disagree that residents do not ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17307692308 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08108132482 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626923076923 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.503149955 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165058572217 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615277807853 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701599197595 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111770731019 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610401476406 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.