Some people think that Universities should offer places to students who have high marks. Others think that Universities should take people of all ages whether they perform well or not.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
certain individuals argued that excellent performance should be a criteria in admitting students to higher institutions, whereas other proponents felt universities should admit people irrespective of their ages and Academic performance. In my opinion, good grades should be considered while offering admission to aspiring undergraduates this will make them more serious with their studies and further give the institutiontion good reputation.
There are some compelling reasons why some people argue that universities should only offer admission to students of good grades. Of course, this should be a standing protocol. One of which is being serious about studies. The students are focused and well-prepared to acquire the pass mark for admission. Another good reason is that it gives the institution a good reputation by producing the best candidates thereby making name for itself. For example ECWA school of nursing Egbe in Nigeria admits the best from thousands of applicants each academic year. Relatively, the school produces the best of nurses in Nigeria. Hence this makes intending Nursing students prepare well for such opportunity.
However, others felt irrespective of ages and academic performance, students should be admitted into higher institutions. they believe everybody have an equal rights in the society, so no one should be deprived the right to education. The proponents of this claimed that a special course for training institution should be established for individuals that are slow learners, or are of age. For example, the unified Tertiary Matriculation (UTME) board have organised its examination in such a way that every aspiring undergraduates gets admission into any institution by reducing its Mark to 120points for colleges of education at least. Hence, everybody is offered an admission.
In conclusion, there is a difference of opinion as to whether students are offered admission into higher institution based on academic performance and ages. In my opinion, excellent academic performance should be considered while offering admission to aspiring under graduates as this will make them devoted to their studies and subsequently promoting the image of the institution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Certain
certain individuals argued that excellent perfo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...produces the best of nurses in Nigeria. Hence this makes intending Nursing students p...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...d be admitted into higher institutions. they believe everybody have an equal rights ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for individuals that are slow learners, or are of age. For example, the unified ...
^^
Line 13, column 49, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...usion, there is a difference of opinion as to whether students are offered admission into hig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66366366366 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09860437888 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3579444265 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.941176471 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224199186704 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759447237809 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705407691606 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149309535513 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366114387297 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.