People hold different points of view regarding whether railways or roads should receive an allocation from the governments. I strongly convince that governments should use their expense on enhancing roads due in large part to its benefits in a long run.
First of all, it is understandable why some advocate spending public money on railway systems. Their primary rationale is more modern trains would attract more passengers to try and result in cutting down the overload of road transport. However, the issue of traffic jams could be solved by building exclusively parallel lanes for a vast array of vehicles, arranging kinds of vehicles on the road, just to name a few. Moreover, it is also noticeable that catching train would be inconvenient since it depends much on the fixed time schedule, thus those people in emergencies would hardly commute to their destinations. For example, a pregnant woman needs to give birth immediately at midnight, and getting on a train might be mostly unfeasible.
As regards developing road networks, it would support our issue of travel in many beneficial ways. Nowadays there is a wide range of vehicles, including cars, motorbike, truck, mobile home, etc, which provide us many options to choose. The development of vehicles would also accompany with the demand for high-quality roads and the responsibility of governments is tremendously required. A highway system in good condition would preserve the duration of means of transport and appropriate traffic management facilities such as bridges, the traffic light would mitigate much of serious traffic accidents. That is not to mention the flexibility that a private mode of transport could bring off under any hard circumstances.
In conclusion, I am in favor of supporting the government to invest in expanding the highway system rather than the railway because of the unadmitted merits in analyzed aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge part to its benefits in a long run. First of all, it is understandable why s...
^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...trains would attract more passengers to try and result in cutting down the overload of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'need'?
Suggestion: need
...inations. For example, a pregnant woman needs to give birth immediately at midnight, ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on a train might be mostly unfeasible. As regards developing road networks, it ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring off under any hard circumstances. In conclusion, I am in favor of supporti...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, as regards, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31353135314 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95697783829 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650165016502 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.205527709 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.846153846 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14659018122 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510143695832 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519486328162 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976028632843 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415250241316 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.