Some people argue that education could become more appropriate towards crimes rather than normal imprisonment. From my perspective I totally agree with this statement because of the advantages of good education.
On the one hand traditional kind of punishment can bring better deterrence by putting criminals in jail. The prevalence of incarceration in many countries might stem from a common belief that prisons are a suitable place to execute punishment on those who violate severe crimes. If illegal activities are shown to have terrible consequences, those who served their sentence will less likely to re-offend the law after being jail. This, however, could prove counterproductive to minor crimes such as shoplifting, pickpocketing. The law-breakers would bear resentment due to difficulty finding regular employment, rather than grow feeling of repentance like being expected.
On the other hand, education could resolve the remained problem with petty crimes and gain more benefits in the long run. Not frightening offenders away like imprisonment. Rehabilitation helps them understand why they should conform to the law willingly. When awareness is raising, the crime rate will also diminish to deter from creating would -be criminals. In the period of sentence, prisoners are inclined to contribute to the society rather than hold a grudge. For instance learning to be a labor worker can lead them to reintegrate like other normal workers.
To sum up, training programs instead of imprisonment would be a more desirable measure as it can raise people's awareness of obeying the law and eliminate grudge one may have after serving their sentence.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for instance, kind of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45525291829 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00263073095 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68093385214 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6420439056 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.142857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149342536068 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425186858517 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388477811906 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895425028732 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017974741004 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.