Government should spend money on railways rather than roads
to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The economic growth of a country is ensured with the help of multiple sectors of the government such as manufacturing, infrastructure, transportation, imports, and exports. Among these sectors, the apex share is held by transportation which makes life more sophisticated. I completely agree with the statement, the government should allot more budget to pave and maintain railways than to roads.
Railways aren’t a form of transportation medium that only carries massive frights and aids in connecting remote locations within a country. Nevertheless, the crowded metropolitan cities like Delhi, Chennai, Bangalore in India have been successful in equipping intercity rail and metro routes that have proven to be extremely beneficial to their inhabitants. These are some well-known advantages of railways including electric trains which has a minimal environmental impact, higher-good and passenger-carrying capacity, cost-effective transportation for low-wage workers.
By contrast, people always have some unpleasant memories by road travel, especially in recent times most cities are packed and roads are always overcrowded with vehicles. Reasons, why road transport shall not be appropriate for most countries, are higher price per distance travelled compared to railways, unprecedented hike in petrol and diesel price, traffic during peak working hours, as well as the notorious noise and air pollution which raised global activists concern, which in turn provoked the need to find better ways of transportation.
To conclude, the government and policymakers ought to focus on controlling detrimental side effects of road transport by decreasing the funding, thereby the budget can be diverted into the railway industry for building better environment and people friendly railways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve and maintain railways than to roads. Railways aren’t a form of transportation...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91153846154 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30866488385 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688461538462 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.5864310043 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.777777778 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147784866423 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662861160232 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864630334657 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892533438718 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627760853898 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.59 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.