Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree orr disagree with this statement.
Some people think that railways should be invested more money instead of roads. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this idea.
Roads play an important role in transportation systems of all countries. This is especially true in rural and remote areas such as some provinces in North West of Vietnam. In the areas, people have to go on foot or by bicycles because of very sloop mountains which are very difficult to travel. Roads play an integral part in satisfying the base traveling demand of citizens of the provinces. In addition, roads are more convenient for various demands of travelers. Because by roads, people can travel to different places whenever they want to go and with whatever the distances are. For such reasons, only investing for railways and neglecting to pay enough attention to roads do not effectively satisfy the demands of travelers in any countries.
On the other hand, if governments give high priorities on building railways, the costs are huge and not all countries can have sufficient finance sources to invest for such plans. In some developing countries like Vietnam for instance, the governments needs to borrow or receive large supporting funds from international donors to develop their railway systems. Moreover, in order to build an effective railway network, a country needs to have a suitable infrastructure including train stations, a lot of connecting routes that enable travelers to conveniently reach their destinations. Thus, not all governments can satisfy the requirements.
In conclusion, although railways are important, investments spending on the transportation system without paying enough money for roads are not good ideas for governments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36940298507 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98005875229 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619402985075 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8129641629 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136137266315 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503676237186 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511382533507 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108429332719 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743830875307 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.