Policymakers provide a lot of financial assistance to creative people. While some believe that artists can make people happy with their work but I believe mitigating people's basic needs should be prioritized over financing on artists.
Artists are always people who try to make people feel good. But by being a professional artist like painter, musician, and magician, people earn a lot less. So, governments finance a lot of organizations that deal with artists. A survey published in "Monthly Charu" revealed that music teacher has least average pay scale among all the professions. However, I believe that other sectors that deal with basic human needs like food, clothing, housing, education, and health service availability need more financing.
Some argue that basic human needs should be fulfilled first then financing on the other sector may come in action. When basic biological needs are not accessible to 60% of people in the world, it is luxurious to spend resources on art or culture. In Somalia, the Education Ministry decided to spend it's 38% of the budget in art education while seven out of ten children has no access to education. So, mitigating the major needs i.e., food, education, etc should be the priority rather than spending resources music production.
In conclusion, governments around the world can spend a lot of artists but they should be aware of the fact that basic human needs are the first thing to look at and mitigating issues relating to this should be prioritized over any other thing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...cing on artists. Artists are always people who try to make people feel good. But b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, may, so, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1593625498 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74791248034 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581673306773 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2972841262 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.916666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833246465434 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039370113575 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378761594308 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059410888382 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031940004184 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.