Governments prohibiting the underage children for getting full-time jobs in certain countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Child labour is not uncommon among developing countries. Numerous nations are restricting juveniles to only work on part-time basis. This decision might seem irrational, however, this essay agrees with this proposition as it is the most effective way to obtain competent professionals in the future.
Working on a full-time basis may encourage children to refrain them from studies. Clearly, when a child is working 9 or 10 hours a day, it is almost impossible for them to cope up with their studies. In Iraq, for instance, the literacy rate is about 30% due to the fact that its citizens start to work at the age of 13 or 14. Therefore, if regimes are outlawing young children not to work in long shifts in their childhood the sole purpose is to persuade them to study so that they can become literate professionals in the future.
Additionally, even if the children start to work for 6 to 10 hours a day, they would never be able to raise their living standard. This is because since they are being employed in some menial full-time jobs from early age, they obviously did not pursue further studies which mean it is unlikely that they may get to a higher position in the corporate ladder. For example, to become a Manager or Chief Executive of a company one needs a degree. Therefore, this practice to working on full-time basis might not enable them to reach higher designations.
Clearly, by working at an early age one might get to earn money faster than other counterparts although it would restrict them to remain at lower level positions. Therefore, it is best for juveniles to work only for few hours a week for their intellectual development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80139372822 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73411505922 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1543878627 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157842915171 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591090155776 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327662980751 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944820253902 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026935212413 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.