Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is true that, in a modern society, the raiways are quickly developed by the investment of government. While I accepted that authorities should concentrate on develop in railways, I believe that others kind of roads also need to expand.
On the one hand, there are variety of reasons why government should spend money on railways. Firstly, trains is one of the most safety transport because it reduces the rate of accidents. Trains have its own route when particiate in traffic, that means it can decrease the dangerous for passengers. In addition, the fees railways invariably cheaper than other vehicles, so it becomes the priority of people when choosing vehicle to take a trip. For example, in Vietnam, the amount of money passenger must use when go from Hannoi to Ho Chi Minh city by plane highe threes time when go by train, so Vietnamese people often choose train when they want to go Ho Chi Minh city.
On the other hand, many roads rather than railways play an vital role in contribute profits in trade of nation. Roads traffic are the places that use for familiar vehicles such as motobike, car, vans and bicycle. These transport was used in daily activities to help employee go to work, stduents go to school and use for delivering goods by vans or truck. Moreover, it is more flexible for people when take part in traffic by roads because they can reduce waiting time for buying tickets and follow the schedule of the train, therefore they can save time foe onther thing.
In conclusion, it seems evident that railways is an important roads should be developed, but government should invest on variations roads, not only on railways.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... on develop in railways, I believe that others kind of roads also need to expand. On ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to train'
Suggestion: to train
...rain, so Vietnamese people often choose train when they want to go Ho Chi Minh city. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d, many roads rather than railways play an vital role in contribute profits in tra...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'road'?
Suggestion: road
...s evident that railways is an important roads should be developed, but government sho...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82746478873 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51806358486 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5783936015 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139719373006 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584856173024 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660207100879 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933540941212 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431263450553 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... on develop in railways, I believe that others kind of roads also need to expand. On ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to train'
Suggestion: to train
...rain, so Vietnamese people often choose train when they want to go Ho Chi Minh city. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d, many roads rather than railways play an vital role in contribute profits in tra...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'road'?
Suggestion: road
...s evident that railways is an important roads should be developed, but government sho...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82746478873 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51806358486 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5783936015 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139719373006 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584856173024 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660207100879 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933540941212 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431263450553 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.