Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement ?
Nowadays, as the development of our society regarding to the facilities such as transportation aspect. To this extent, there is an opinion that goverment should pay more recognition to railways rather than roads. This essay is going to clarify this idea.
First and foremost, both options have different characteristics. Roads, as we know, have been installed and put in use centuries ago. From the very first simple to the more advanced module, roads have played a crucial role in our civilization. There are many ways of transportation such as going by sea, by air but travelling in land by roads shine out the most. Second, roads are easy to build. The method is not difficult, step one is to clear the path, next up pour a layer of rock mixture to create a steady way, wait it dry out and finish. Easier said than done, many roads are worse than ever before due to overused or lack of quality.
Therefore, railways should be a solution, an alternative way of transportation. Coming up with the installment of trains, railways are first developed and used back in 19th century. The process of making railways is way harder than roads. Many features would be needed to complete a railways plus the train station. But on the other hand, travel in railways is safer than roads because of the one - way moving. The second advantage is trains are put in the public transportations category, this not only improve the traffic situation nowadays but also is good to the environment.
Overall, there are pros and cons of both putting cash on these two ways of going. However, in my opinion, I would likely to support roads thanks to its simplicity, not complex as going in railways by trains. And hopefully, in the future, goverments find out the more effective way to spend money on both roads and railways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dries'?
Suggestion: dries
...mixture to create a steady way, wait it dry out and finish. Easier said than done, ...
^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transportations'' or 'transportation's'?
Suggestion: transportations'; transportation's
...vantage is trains are put in the public transportations category, this not only improve the tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78913738019 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74445620102 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581469648562 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5034624249 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8947368421 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4736842105 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169726639927 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537227418494 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626686484941 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113546264842 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687104569548 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.