Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In modern days, one of the controversial debate related to how to improve roads or railways. Although some people strongly believe that government of a country develop railways instead of roads by spending money, i prefer that spending for roads is more profitable. In this essay, i will consider many negative affect of building railways and then secondly why government must spent money on roads.
On one side of the argument there are people who claim that building railways bring many issue of finance. The primary reason for believing this is that to do project of the new railway, the budget of a government is used by about 34% that is once time, and procedure of railways continues about from 2 year to 3 year. One important illustration of this is that graph of growth of railways between 2005 and 2015 year i saw revealed that last 5 years a gradually increase means that cause of specific reasons, development of railway have fallen.
On the other hand, road is possible to make opposing cases. use of road is increasing day by day and have many benefit than railway. That it require a short-term procedure and spend a less money than railway significantly assist a budget of government applied for many problems that faced to human being. A particularly good example is here is in recently research, last decade the quality of roads rapidly increased by helping government in several country which are US, UK, British and like that.
In conclusion, in my opinion, that spending money for roads can be more beneficial than on development of railways promoted by aspect of finance and time.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ays instead of roads by spending money, i prefer that spending for roads is more ...
^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...oads is more profitable. In this essay, i will consider many negative affect of b...
^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun issue seems to be countable; consider using: 'many issues'.
Suggestion: many issues
... who claim that building railways bring many issue of finance. The primary reason for beli...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... of railways between 2005 and 2015 year i saw revealed that last 5 years a gradua...
^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...5 year i saw revealed that last 5 years a gradually increase means that cause of specific reasons, d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Use
...oad is possible to make opposing cases. use of road is increasing day by day and ha...
^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun benefit seems to be countable; consider using: 'many benefits'.
Suggestion: many benefits
... road is increasing day by day and have many benefit than railway. That it require a short-t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'less money'.
Suggestion: less money
...equire a short-term procedure and spend a less money than railway significantly assist a bud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86131386861 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67884206128 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57299270073 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7368857728 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.090909091 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227825363341 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867030821941 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615404658998 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143915180965 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260594015341 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.