Governments should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that governments should invest more financial aids in researching medicine and less in researching the environment. In my opinion, however, I completely agree that the environmental research should be gotten more funds than medical research due the benefits of the environmental research overshadow the benefits of the another.
Admittedly, investing money in medical research brings a variety of advantages, such as improving people’s health. If some financial aids of governments are funded into some medical projects, scientist will be obvious to create some new vaccins or increase the quality of some medicine. Therefore, people’s health will not be in danger thanks to these new vaccins and medicines. Hence, people have more chances to earn money to live their family and help the community due the cycle time of them can be expanded by the modern of medical industry.
However, it is not worth it to invest more money in medical research and less one in environmental research because the advantages of the environmental research overweigh the ones of the another. For instance, if some environmental projects can be developed, people can exactly understand the environment and the condition in the world. Therefore, people might change their patterns and improve the environmental condition by some activities, such as the variation from the private vehicle to the public transportation. The environmental issues, thus, will bedeclined, and people can live in a better environmental condition and the better atmosphere. Hence, humans’ health can be positive improved if people live in a fresh atmosphere.
To sum up, I believe that governmnets should provide more money in the environmental research than the medical research because the benefits of the environmental project can overweigh the ones of the medical project.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49128919861 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11865570838 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452961672474 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7222129753 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271204643215 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11924289606 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121695908761 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212441577001 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973971113757 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.