The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth century. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and the comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services contributed to the UK economy in the twentieth century. For ten years, the UK economy had many changes in the contribution of selected sectors.
In general, the contribution of agriculture and manufacturing to the UK economy decreased, however, business and financial services increased over the period given.
Obviously, from 1990 to 1950, agriculture played a main role in the UK economy, accounted for almost half of the total economy (49%). There was a steady rise from 49% to around 52% of the contribution of agriculture. However, in 1975, it fell to around 10% and ended up in the lowest contributor (2%) to the economy in 2000.
Likewise, the manufacturing sector also showed a similar pattern. In 1900, the contribution of manufacturing stood the second place in UK economy with 45%; nevertheless, it dropped suddenly to 15% in 2000. In 1975, it surpassed the others, coming to the main sector in the contribution (33%)
On the contrary, the business and financial sector showed a completely different trend. At the beginning of the twentieth century, the Business and Financial sector rose significantly from 3% to around 35% in 1990 and 2000 respectively. Over 25 years of time, it became the top of the three sectors that accounted for one-third of the total economy.
In conclusion, at the start of the twentieth century, agriculture and manufacturing sectors contributed mostly in the UK economy. While the business and financial sector led up when the economy changed to the advanced era.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the others, coming to the main sector in the contribution 33% On the contrary,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24418604651 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16050276344 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472868217054 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5281853204 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428821004906 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15656436496 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840717888872 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234036521139 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710822720218 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.