A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people
and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that
humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, includes uses for food
and research.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
There have been ongoing debates whether human being should use animals for their
needs or not. There are spit opinions regarding this. Some believe that it is immoral and they
should be treated as equals; however, a few others claim that animals can be used for any
purpose. Therefore, before arriving on a decision, both views should be examined.
Discussing the first view, the foremost arguments the animal lovers put forward is
that the animals are as important as humans in nature. Though they are not superior to
humans, they form a vital clue in the food chain. So, they should neither be used nor be
disturbed. Besides this, to exploit animals in any manner is immoral unethical. Experts to
animal rights say that all the members in the living kingdom have equal rights to survive.
On the flip side, the supporters of the latter view favours exploitation of animals for
their needs and purposes. The most valid reason they give is that humans being the most
superior animals in nature, they get an unsaid right to use the lower animals. Apart from this,
it has been proved since ages that the relationship between the two is quite mutual. Rather
than harming, man has tactfully used animals for different purpose based on the animal’s
physical ability or its unique skill. To illustrate, dogs are used by the police for their sense of
smell, horses to travel, donkeys as least of burden and many more examples.
To conclude and give my opinion, I would certainly vote for the second opinion. The
reason is that although man exploits animals for his need, the relationship has not disturbed
the nature to a serious extent. However, care should be taken that this confidence should not
ignore the harm that can seriously decrease their numbers or damage them in any manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...human being should use animals for their needs or not. There are spit opinions re...
^^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Some believe that it is immoral and they should be treated as equals; however, a ...
^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s claim that animals can be used for any purpose. Therefore, before arriving on a...
^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...guments the animal lovers put forward is that the animals are as important as hum...
^^^
Line 6, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nature. Though they are not superior to humans, they form a vital clue in the fo...
^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... So, they should neither be used nor be disturbed. Besides this, to exploit anim...
^^^
Line 8, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... manner is immoral unethical. Experts to animal rights say that all the members i...
^^^
Line 10, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...view favours exploitation of animals for their needs and purposes. The most valid...
^^^
Line 11, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they give is that humans being the most superior animals in nature, they get an ...
^^^
Line 12, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... use the lower animals. Apart from this, it has been proved since ages that the r...
^^^
Line 13, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... between the two is quite mutual. Rather than harming, man has tactfully used ani...
^^^
Line 14, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erent purpose based on the animal's physical ability or its unique skill. To...
^^^
Line 15, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re used by the police for their sense of smell, horses to travel, donkeys as leas...
^^^
Line 17, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtainly vote for the second opinion. The reason is that although man exploits ani...
^^^
Line 18, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...need, the relationship has not disturbed the nature to a serious extent. However,...
^^^
Line 19, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be taken that this confidence should not ignore the harm that can seriously decre...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95751633987 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36658399568 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6945145889 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2352941176 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 16.0 5.01903807615 319% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383885458352 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119585571788 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076758604228 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112953554093 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773310274459 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.