With growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. Is it a positive or negative development?
Since there is an increasing number of people residing in urban areas, a vast majority of them resort to houses with almost no open air spaces. While this tendency initiates controversial debates, I am of the opinion that it triggers adverse effects on house owners’ physical and mental health.
The most evident demerit would be degrading health conditions of the residents. First and foremost, people living in almost totally indoor spaces may suffer from respiratory diseases and illnesses, since this type of house has fewer vents for air to circulate, causing the harmful germs and virus to be trapped indoor. For example, an enclosed apartment is the ideal environment for SARS-COVI-2 virus to proliferate and infect those staying inside. In addition, little or no open space would limit people from exercising, which may act as a contributor to overweight or obesity, or even further, cardiovascular and circulatory diseases.
At the same time, I believe that enclosed house owners are more likely prone to some sorts of mental issues. In fact, little exposure to sunlight and exercises is one of the main reasons people have to deal with psychogenic relating problems like stress or depression. This is because sunlight and exercising help relieve nervous tension, thus decrease mental disorders inducing elements. A recent research from John Hopkins University states that spending at least an hour jogging outdoor would improve people’s mental health and reduce the chance of getting psychiatric disorder by 30%.
In conclusion, the trend of no-open-space home is apparently conducive to the deteriorating physical as well as mental condition of citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: Recent research
...ase mental disorders inducing elements. A recent research from John Hopkins University states tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, if, may, so, thus, well, while, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41603053435 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8395740966 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671755725191 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7813970539 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126532875113 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420705953892 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370433825842 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713401839155 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018228850112 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.