With growing population in cities more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas Is it a positive or negative development

As the urban population grows, there is an increase in the number of people living in homes with small or limited outdoor space. This trend is having a negative impact on the psychology and physical health of human beings, as individuals living in such homes are more susceptible to respiratory illnesses, mental health problems, and a lack of physical activity.

Firstly, limited outdoor space in homes can lead to respiratory problems as there are fewer vents to circulate air, leading to the accumulation of germs and viruses. Additionally, studies have shown that individuals living in homes with large open spaces are less likely to suffer from illnesses related to mental health such as depression and anxiety. This is because individuals living in homes with limited outdoor space may feel claustrophobic and trapped, leading to feelings of stress and anxiety.

Furthermore, living in a home with limited outdoor space can lead to a lack of physical activity, making individuals more susceptible to health issues such as obesity. According to the World Health Organization, 33% of the global population lives a sedentary lifestyle due to a lack of outdoor space. This trend also leads to a decrease in immunity as individuals are not exposed to sunlight. Lack of exposure to sunlight has been linked to increased health problems, as 45% of teenagers suffer from health issues because they are not exposed to sunlight.

In conclusion, the trend of having houses with limited outdoor space is responsible for mental and physical illnesses. To combat this negative trend, policymakers should consider the importance of outdoor space and include it in urban planning. This can be done by increasing the number of parks, community gardens, and other outdoor spaces to ensure that everyone has access to green spaces that improve physical and mental health

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32441471572 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.803816787 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468227424749 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4267720533 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224672035645 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10308577218 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862973275534 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165094578948 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074392474493 0.056905535591 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32441471572 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.803816787 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468227424749 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4267720533 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224672035645 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10308577218 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862973275534 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165094578948 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074392474493 0.056905535591 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.