With a growing world population one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that genetically-modified foods offer a viable solution to this problem. Do you agree or disagree?
Starving has always been a major source of people's health issues. Some people believe that synthetically engineered crops are able to satisfy the increasing demand for food on our planet. I strongly agree with this opinion since genetically modified vegetables are cheaper to produce and it possesses various nutritions that are necessary for human beings.
Biologiests are capable of granting arbitrary properties for genetically engineered organisms allowing them to reduce production costs. This can be achieved by increasing the size of a particular plant by modifying the specific gene, which is responsible for the size of the organism. Moreover, resistance against flys and other animals that consume this plant is able to significantly deminish farmer's loses. For example, the recent studies has been published in Times and stated that the costs of producing GM tomatos in Spain are approximately twice lower that organic tomatos. Thus, the amount of food can be easily enlarged by utilizing gene engineering worldwide.
In addition to above-mentioned aspect, the variety of nutritions viable for human health can also be enriched with genetic science. Since people require numerous vitamins and minerals, unlike traditon crops, newly synthesized food contains all necessary components. Therefore, individual should consume less vegetables, and more humans can be fed from a unit of soil's area. For instance, orange production in Thailand has dropped dramatically freeing land for other plants after engineering the golden rice, which is a valuable source of vitamin C for locals. In other words, people are able to reduce a number of food they eat.
In conclusion, I believe that genetic engineering is a feasible approach to feed the human population.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vegetables is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s. Therefore, individual should consume less vegetables, and more humans can be fed ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun food seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much food', 'a good deal of food'.
Suggestion: much food; a good deal of food
... other words, people are able to reduce a number of food they eat. In conclusion, I believe t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51102941176 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91654900694 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1417682758 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.071428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148917322052 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559040313572 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445464386836 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994726442822 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504369679598 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vegetables is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s. Therefore, individual should consume less vegetables, and more humans can be fed ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun food seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much food', 'a good deal of food'.
Suggestion: much food; a good deal of food
... other words, people are able to reduce a number of food they eat. In conclusion, I believe t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51102941176 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91654900694 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1417682758 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.071428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148917322052 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559040313572 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445464386836 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994726442822 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504369679598 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.