The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment.
What are the causes of this?
What can be done to solve this problem?
The unconscious consumption of goods has become one of the main features of modern societies. The main victim of the growth of manufacturing new goods for people is the Earth's environment. This essay will discuss main reasons of this phenomenon, as well as provide a feasible solutions.
The manufacturing of new products require a lot of energy, which production impact the greenhouse effect, and produce waste, that humanity is not able to recycle. Therefore, the increase in production implies the rise in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and a garbage produced by factories. In addition to the above-mentioned observation, all new gadgets, that are the major category of goods, purchesed by customers, contain battaries, which disposal is impossible, and people have store broken entities for centuries in order to prevent soil erosion. For example, according to the department of statistics of Germany, the concentration of CO2 in air has been increasing in last decades in cities, where most factories are located. In other words, manufacturing of goods cause damage to the environment by producing various wastes in all steps of a pipeline.
In order to overcome these issues, the undesired outcomes should be reduced, making factories eco-friendly. This can be achieved by installing special filters on energy plants and other industrial objects, preventing emissions of CO2. Another aspect that should be researched and improved is recycling. By recycling most of trash crafted by human beings, the amout of polutants can be dramatically decreased.
In conclusion, this essay has highlighted major causes of the pollution of the natural environment and provided viable solutions to neglect negative consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
...enomenon, as well as provide a feasible solutions. The manufacturing of new products r...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50751879699 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14805349822 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609022556391 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4437085637 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228295005098 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707205868389 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491783042129 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126831494061 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225481481922 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.