Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed , while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both and give your opinion.
Human beings are giving birth to new innovations that has been proven perilous for both Flora and fauna. Can this impact on the plants and animals be refined? Although some people opine that this cannot be altered, others contradict this statement. In following paragraph, I will shed light on both the perspectives.
There is no denying in the fact that humans are consistently imposing damage to the Flora and fauna especially the irreversible damage. To elaborate, mankind is leading to deforestation as they need space to live. Consequently, they are vanishing animal's habitat. Because the forest requires hundreds of years to grow again, this is a damage which cannot be retrieved easily. Moreover, these days, various products are being productive in abundance that is continuously leading to air pollution. Nearly all the household and commercial equipment used by humans emit harmful gases which has proven injurious to animals as well as plants.
In contrast to this, human beings can control this prominent and serious issue by adapting some crucial steps. Firstly, they should start great more and more trees. It must be mandatory for every house to grow one tree in their backyard. Secondly, animals can be protected by the government with the help of wildlife sanctuaries and other non-government organization. If public and the government will coordinate, this issue can be deter completely.
In conclusion, man should keep in mind that Flora and fauna are the crucial part of ecosystem. Therefore, they should be conserved for the future generations. According to my perspective, there is nothing which cannot be changed, by following some strategies, this negative impact can be reversed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contradict this statement. In following paragraph, I will shed light on both the...
^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rucial steps. Firstly, they should start great more and more trees. It must be ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32472324723 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88569851032 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9406820972 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1666666667 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0555555556 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324360199989 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101997053183 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944040461613 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212550184049 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863686821078 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.