Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. Why is this? Is this the best solution to traffic congestion?
Bicycle is the most convenient and inexpensive mode of transportation. These days, ample of nations are expending money to promote bicycle use among public by making is more easier to use. There are several reasons behind this pay out. Although this is not only the optimum way to overcome the traffic problem, many other amendments are also required.
To commence with, the government of various countries is spending money on constructing the roads and footpaths that are allotted to cyclists and pedestrians only. For instance, in Canada, there are many roads which have special lanes for cyclists and no other vehicle can enter in this lane that ensures the safety of bicycle riders. Undoubtedly, many other countries are increasingly following this practice to reduce traffic and protect the environment from harmful gases omitted by motor vehicles. In addition, cycling help people to stay healthy, while riding to work, they also do physical excercise. This keeps an individual fit and prevent serious health issues such as hypertension and diabetes.
Admittedly, this practice can help to reduce traffic to some extent. Apart from this, there are numerous other strategies that are equally essential to halt the problem of traffic congestion. To elaborate, widening of roads, building highways, encouraging people to use public transit are also some measures which should be looked by the government.
To conclude, promoting bicycles is an imperative step towards diminishing traffic jams. However, other measures should not be overlooked by government as they are also crucial to solve this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...e bicycle use among public by making is more easier to use. There are several reasons behin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4126984127 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74614643306 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7883471943 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28562368395 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911090041838 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045519000631 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167308169386 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371181433442 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.