If countries are serious about solving traffic problems, they should tax private cars very heavily and use the money to provide free or very cheap rail travel.
The level of traffic problems has altogether expanded in the recent decade witnessing the considerable object it has caused to many nations around the world. A faction of people think that rising the tax on private vehicles and using that money to enhance free or cheap public transportation is a solution. I will try to throw light upon the declaration of this method as well as i will try to posit my perspective about it.
Initiatively, there are multifarious reasons that shore those people with below opinion. To start with, the tax increase may cut down on the amount of personal cars. To explain, due to the fortune people have to pay to maintain the use of their vehicles, it might lead to the majority of people giving up their own transportation as a result of being incapable of completing the payment. Probing further, the fewer cars transport, the less polluted the atmosphere could be. Apparently, when there are fewer autos, the carbon footprints could fall. Therefore, green house effect can be dramatically reduced.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks when forcing drivers to leave their autos behind. The first one to be mentioned is the inconvenience for the private drivers. Obviously, for instance, if they unfortunately miss the train to the office, they would have to wait for the next one, which could tackle their punctuality. Additionally, the surge of public transport users may create the strain. The chaos on the train is the chance for pocket picker or sexual harassment.
Conclusively, there both good side and bad side about this development. However, I pertinaciously believe that the merits far outweight the demerits
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e declaration of this method as well as i will try to posit my perspective about ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05072463768 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86026343373 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63768115942 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5873763262 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108009100968 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284169841642 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462183350751 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587134703057 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452786606553 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.