Improvements in health, education, and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this global world community, there are two nuances of nation, development, and advance. Some of developed countries rely their continuity on their alliances, others may not depend on the others. There are some sector issues that could improve the wealthy of dependent countries, as such increasing healthy population, manufacturing good education, and reliable trading activities. However, there is an argument that those improvements still do not help the poorer countries without the support from advanced country.
That last argument, I would convince that is not necessarily untrue. We are now in the period of post-colonialism. Previously, western colonialists exploited the eastern regions. As a result, many oriental countries undeveloped in a long period. However, after the world war ended not little victim countries recovered themselves with the aids of such great powers. Commonwealth countries, the former regions were conquered by the British government, had already recovered by the hands of British. Many Britain's scholarships had already established exclusively for all youngsters from all commonwealth regions, as such, India, Africa, Malaysia. In return, the graduate students can help to improve their homeland's education.
That situation may differ from the former Japan's and Portuguese's exploited countries. They were abandoned and recovered by themselves. As result, they took many years to develop. And now, could be seen that economics and educations of commonwealth countries improve so drastically than others development countries. India alone has the big populations of professors than Indonesia. Furthermore, Africa already has built rocket space, thanks to Britain responsibilities.
Above all, the mutual relationship endures the poverty regions becoming much more wealthy. The independent countries may regain the prosperity but it can take progress in such long way. Therefore, conquer countries should be in touch their former exploited countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85862068966 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11026263367 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.185463312 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9047619048 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8095238095 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143510426399 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033848116977 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395661030342 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831154307472 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485984806687 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.