The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
In the modern age, the growing demand for large amounts of purchased goods leads to mass production of commodities, which is the main factor of environmental degradation. The reasons for this are discussed as below.
On one hand, factories dispose of industrial waste irresponsibly. As mass production develops, factories are producing an increasing amount of toxic waste, which are discharged into land and rivers. This means that the land and water are spoiled by chemicals seriously and results in environmental contamination. On the other hand, the emission of carbon footprints is inevitable during the production process. The gas emission from factories is disposed into air. It contains carbon dioxide and methane, which cause the global warming and loss of biodiversity. Many species are now in danger due to climate change. For example, the polar bears in the north and deep south are subject to living room narrowing because the glaciers are melting at an alarming pace.
Measures should be urgently taken to combat this situation. First, government should not be afraid to introduce green taxes on industries. This will effectively regulate the discharge of chemical waste in the production and reduce the carbon emission. Second, individuals should take actions as well. We can offset the carbon prints by flying less and reduce the food miles by buying the local products. All these are efficient ways to help alleviate the environmental problems.
In conclusion, irresponsible disposal of industrial waste and emission of carbon footprints are the major elements causing environmental damage and government as well as the public should cooperate to contribute to environmental protection.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49242424242 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00317401729 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598484848485 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9305399884 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2941176471 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196000000895 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544890898383 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495049356377 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113079392648 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160730186181 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.