An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage of the natural environment. What are the causes and possible solutions?
Today we are living in an era of continuously increasing demand. The rate of consumption is stand at higher red alert level. Consumers mentality of buying goods lead to high production it which directly effect on the natural environment. There are several reasons of such kind of situation and some primitive steps should be taken to overcome this issue. Both the causes and remedies are discussed further.
Discussing the reasons of the high production rate of commodities, many examples can be put forward. The foremost one is that escalation in statistic of population. What I mean, high people strength is main reason of high demands. Every mankind wants to use different type of goods to improve their life quality. They have different wishes to buy and use. Moreover, improving buying capacity also plays an important role in this. Explaining it, since last two decades constantly improvement have been seen in ability of shopping because of developing economics. That’s why people are more interested to buy variety and various things. Furthermore, the manufacturing industries are producing cheaper consumer goods by compromising quality. Mostly, they have to discarded after some time of use. The most serious effect of this phenomenon is on the environment. Our landfill sites are filling up with non bio-degradable wastes. It is leading to pollution. Destroying used plastic is also a major problem.
The solution are not so easy. Firstly, people have to be aware of the harmful consequences. People should buy only what is necessary. Secondly, as far as possible bio-degradable materials should be used as row materials and excessive packing should be avoided. Thirdly, people should start to use paper bags instead of plastic one. What next, Industries should try alternative sources of energy during production.
To conclude, I pen down saying that, consumerism is rampant nowadays and it is having detrimental effect on our environment but some fruitful steps can be taken to minimize the bad effects of excessive consumerism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bad effects of excessive consumerism.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, i mean, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34153846154 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96690064011 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627692307692 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6663010933 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.7692307692 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5 20.7667163134 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11538461538 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160125644217 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384728659423 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552201320875 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889513471682 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742497973207 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.8 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.