An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to our natural environment. What are the causes and solutions?
In this day and age, the production for the final goods of citizens has risen to meet the demand of citizens. Such phenomenon has created various adverse impacts on the natural environment. This essay shall discuss both causes and solutions of this issue.
The modern era has witnessed rapid changes in the speed of industrialization and globalization. Many countries are to develop at a faster pace, which boosts the population growth in big cities. As a consequence, loads of migrants move to those cities with the hope for better job opportunities. These new city dwellers will generate demands for food, water, accommodation, and other fundamental needs that will be quickly satisfied by the manufacturers. Huge final goods consumed each day will release a certain amount of trash to the surrounding areas, hence damaging the natural environment. Especially, most of the garbage is made of plastic or nylon materials which take hundreds of years to be decomposed, and they can penetrate easily into the food chain of wild animals, resulting in the decline in life expectancy of the wildlife.
Therefore, it is essential that the government should take action to guard against this problem. First, governments should raise awareness of people about damages that massive production of consumer good can cause through the educational system, along with the media. Second, it is necessary to levy higher taxes on the companies discharging furtively their wastes and invest in the programmes developing recycling systems. Finally, some auxiliary products should be banned such as plastic drinking straws and nylon bags.
In conclusion, producing a great number of final goods could harm the natural environment. However, this problem can be alleviated by the intervention of the governments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35789473684 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96223485462 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645614035088 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1823957852 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210236385348 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060109674332 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714664949964 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121943288423 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287570812636 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.