A rise in the standard of living in a country seems to only benefits cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference cause? How might the problems be reduced?
Many countries over the world are on the upswing in the economy which leads to higher quality of citizens life. There is an idea that such improvement only brings benefits to the big cities rather than the countryside. This problem could result in various negative effects on society and it should be tackled.
First, if the urban areas develop at a faster pace than the rural ones do, the people from small villages or other provinces will migrate to such big cities in order to opt for the jobs which provide them lucrative incomes. Subsequently, the city will be overcrowded, and the healthcare system cannot burden with steadily increased numbers of patients every year. There are some research showed that the mental and physical health of the city dwellers is getting poorer, compared to those of suburbanites, due to inhaling a great amount of greenhouse gas each day and suffering from enormous working stress. Besides, the overload in educational institutions is another serious concern. A class with over forty pupils may not ensure the expected learning outcomes, hence affecting adversely on the whole national education system.
Therefore, the government should propose appropriate strategies to deal with those harmful obstacles so that maintaining the balance of society and achieving sustainable development. On one hand, they could grant the urban people subsidy to stimulate the local economic development. For example, provinces which have beautiful spots that attract a number of tourists yearly should be given financial support from central authorities to build modern buildings such as five-star hotels and restaurants. On the other hand, the new migrants shall be levied a higher tax if they want to relocate to the cities.
In conclusion, moving to cities can have negative impacts on the overall quality of life of a country and the government should take responsibility for coping with such issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28896103896 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74023473553 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63961038961 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5773510392 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121964637287 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420143901169 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499752933549 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814208413726 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694248472271 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.