The increase in tourism is causing environmental problems. What problems has tourism brought to the environment? What can be done to solve these problems?

Nowadays, vacation industry is getting more and more developed. Thus, that impulses the growth of region, but it is also the cause of ecological destruction. So, in this essay, I will shed some light on the reason of this damage and suggest some solutions.

Tourism can have a negative impact on the environment. Excessive building, such as roads, hotels etc., destroys natural habitats and spoils the landscape. Travel business also creates traffic congestion, pollution and waste. It puts pressure on local resources such as food, water and energy. Besides, the air traffic leads to global warming, as airplanes destroy our ozone layer through greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, overtourism brings about problems of waste disposal, waste thrown away by tourists and improper disposal facilities made by tourist organizations. For example, we often see images of Paris, Beijing or even Mount Everest that are ruined by trash on television or social network.

There are some solutions that need be done to reduce the impact of holiday business on the ecosystem. Firstly, we should show visitors how they can be responsible tourists with events, leaflets, information centres, guided walks and events, signs and websites. Secondly, the government is up to encourage visitors to leave their cars behind and use greener travel, like bikes, buses, boats and trains, inspire small-scale renewable energy schemes, like wood chip boilers and solar panels, with planning policies and grant funding and reduce erosion by creating and repairing footpaths. Furthermore, outdoor activities that don't damage the countryside or harm wildlife should be supported. Last but not least, each locality should limit the tourist numbers in precious places.

In conclusion, the quickly increase of tourism affects harmfully to our environment and we must find methods to limit and control this problem to protect our planet.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s. Furthermore, outdoor activities that dont damage the countryside or harm wildlife...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50169491525 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70913846046 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694915254237 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.825154198 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133192644191 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384485866069 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616163355289 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775416680701 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538346612993 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.