The increase in tourism has led to the destruction of the environment, thus tourism ought to be banned in certain areas.
What is your opinion?
These days, with the advancement of intercontinental transportation, people are reaching the edges of the earth. Tourism is also on the high, with countries opening their borders for people.
However, with the increase of tourists, there can be a huge destruction to the monuments and the areas nearby, which is often leading to the ban of many ancient sites to tourists. I completely disagree with idea and in this essay I support my opinion.
Firstly, mother nature has many natural sites along with historic monuments and ancient masterpieces, which define legacy of the country they belong to. With the rise of people to visit these sites, there is always a danger of destruction. For example, In the middle of the Sahara desert there used to be a tree, which was hit by an angry car driver making the area treeless. These kind of rare landmarks must to be protected properly in order to avoid any bad consequences. Furthermore, the areas which have more cultural significance for centuries are forced to change their culture in order to attract the tourists. For instance, the Jarwa tribe in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands are untouched for centuries, but due to the influx of tourists their culture is being affected. Moreover, some tourists are not disciplined, what I mean by this is that humans in order to take photos, often do unusual movements damaging the surroundings marking the way for banning, but all the issues can be resolved by minimizing tourists or by adding extra protective methods. For example, Bhutan allows only a limited number of tourists to enter the country to protect the heritage.
On the other side, there are many countries which completely depend on tourism like the Carribean. Due to the huge dependency on tourist income, banning tourists can lead to a downfall of the nation's economy. Additionally, with the help of tourism, the outside world can get to know more about the problems and challenges faced by the native population. For example, without the media and tourists, it is very difficult to know about the tribes of the Congo. Finally, many countries due to high significance or more importance of the site, add restrictions to tourists like banning photography or avoiding them touch. These decisions helped many countries to preserve historic places and tourism.
To sum up, despite having significant importance to certain areas, they should not be banned completely. Instead, authorities should add extra security measures to preserve them. In my opinion, many problems related to local people are evident to the outside world because of tourism, moreover, there is also a possibility that people find new things when they reach new environments hence, tourism should not be banned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...ry car driver making the area treeless. These kind of rare landmarks must to be protected ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... treeless. These kind of rare landmarks must to be protected properly in order to avoid...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... tourists can lead to a downfall of the nations economy. Additionally, with the help of...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...certain areas, they should not be banned completely. Instead, authorities should ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i mean, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12444444444 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78476986659 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531111111111 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2481036678 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.80952381 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167233712409 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471473779343 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480465986263 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100917749041 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500769238907 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.