Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

To mitigate increasing traffic and pollution issues, the most effective method is to raise car fuel cost. This essay disagrees that rising petrol cost could help to reduce such problems because oil prices are in a volatile state. An alternative solution to the issues is to encourage people to use public transportation.

The global oil price is fluctuating today. In recent years, oil prices have declined due to the emerging renewable energy market. As the prices drop, gasoline experienced a slump in prices as well. Hence, it is very difficult to increase the price of gasoline for mitigating traffic congestions and air pollution. The fluctuation in oil prices not only affects the gasoline but the energy economy. To exemplify, solar as one of the many energy sources which are clean, gains higher demands for electricity compared to diesel, which is a product of crude oil. This results in a lower supply of crude oil due to a change in commodity and a shift into greener energy alternative, and therefore losing its monetary value.

Alternatively, one measure to reduce increasing traffic and pollution problems is to go green by taking public transport such as bus and train. This encourages people to lessen road congestions and carbon footprint. A recent study concluded that by taking buses or trains instead of driving own cars, thousands of tonnes of carbon dioxide gas can be saved from emitting to the atmosphere and hence improving the air quality of a city.

In conclusion, having a higher cost of gasoline is not the most effective way to tackle congested roads and atmospheric impurity issues as this is due to the fluctuating oil price, so another possible method to solve these problems is to take transportation that is available for public use other than owning a vehicle.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04682274247 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80348564694 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2003892876 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.785714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126672064555 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466202736302 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397678956466 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807020496199 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201882037705 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.