Increasing the price of petrol is best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Nowadays, traffic bottlenecks is increasing with each passing days because of modern era. While other people think that government should increase the cost of petrol but, I believe that it is not a accurate way to solve this problem. Thus , I will give my arguments in the following paragraphs.

There are many solutions to curb this problem but first and foremost is that government should make appropriate rules reagarding this therefore, individuals give less importance to private vehicles. For example, in many country such as Norway, local government has been enacted the rule that one family one keep one provate vehicles owing to this, pollution level of this nation is extremely less as compared to other countries. In addition to this, government had better invest more money on public transport system, and improve the condition of roads. Because of this, people give more importance to public transportation as against to other modes of transportation. As a result, pollution level will automatically decline.

Furthermore, government should oranginze campus related to awareness of environment. So, people can aware about things which lead harmful impacts on environment, and they can decrease the use of these kinds of things. Such as, Indian prime minister Narenda Modi, makes many programmes to aware people about environment that's way most of the Indian masses use material which will easily recycle instead of plastic begs. Moreover, government even other people had better plant trees which are immensely helpful to reduce the level of pollution because they observe co2 and exhale oxygen. Thus, environment balance will be maintained.

To sum up, it is lucid clear that government should apply other beneficial measures to decline the traffic congestion and pollution level as compared to increase the price of petrol.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...of petrol but, I believe that it is not a accurate way to solve this problem. Thu...
^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...accurate way to solve this problem. Thus , I will give my arguments in the followi...
^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and foremost is that government should make appropriate rules reagarding this t...
^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... level of this nation is extremely less as compared to other countries. In additio...
^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as, Indian prime minister Narenda Modi, makes many programmes to aware people ab...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ammes to aware people about environment thats way most of the Indian masses use mater...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39100346021 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77564574012 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60553633218 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0733952817 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109413693667 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416192707433 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537550895527 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939458688897 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620270311898 0.056905535591 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.