It is irrefutable that someone intial impression always catch people' eyes but i believe that other traits also extremely beneficial to get other masses intensions. Thus, l compelety disgaree with this statement and i will discuss my view points in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, I think that folks are not always comfortable in first meeting with someone. In another words, in first meeting individuals do not know about attitude of someone because sometimes, they can feel shy and uncomfortable thus, they do not able to express their emotions appropriatly in front of new inhabitants. For example, if someone engage with person, who is unknown, therefore, he or she does not share their feeling with their partner in first meeting. As a result, first meeting is not always right to know about other persons.
Furthermore, sometimes, our judgement not right in first meeting of someone. Because, it is unideniable to say that unless we share our feeling with someone and spend some quality time with him, we do not know about him or her in accurate way. Apart from that, I think there is one incident in everyone life that when we meet someone in very first time, then our judgement wrong about him or her but in after we know the actual personilty of him to spend sometime with him.
To conclude, it is lucid that we do not judge accuratly to someone in first meeting because people reaction sometimes different in first meeting as compared to real life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...impression always catch people eyes but i believe that other traits also extremel...
^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...pelety disgaree with this statement and i will discuss my view points in upcoming...
^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'engages'.
Suggestion: engages
...ew inhabitants. For example, if someone engage with person, who is unknown, therefore,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Furthermore, sometimes, our judgement not right in first meeting of someone. B...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62108679749 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2921725482 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178869136704 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844124329506 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251288926968 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109883591513 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023926480262 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.