It is undeniably true that automobiles have become indispensable elements of our lives. However, the troubles associated with their usage and the measures to minimize them have become a subject of debate. While some people think that regulating the fuel prices is the solution, I disagree to such notion and I think there are other alternatives.
To begin with, the argument that the cost of fuel is directly proportional to the usage of vehicles does not hold true in many cases. Consider the example of India, where the price of diesel doubled over the last decade but surprisingly the number of two and four wheelers have increased by multi folds. This shows that the drivers are not at all bothered about the varying expenses.
Therefore, to address such serious concerns, smart decisions need to be taken by the governments. One of them is to shrinking the width of the roads thereby making it tough for drivers to commute on their own. However, this attempt should motivate people to use different modes of public transport. The other way is to encourage electric and solar vehicles by providing tax benefits and subsidies. For instance, many states in the USA offer refunds on the electric vehicles keeping in mind the contributions they make to the environment. What is more, civilians should also bear the responsibility of saving the nature from such anti-elements by supporting such initiatives.
In a nutshell, I think that gambling with the fuel costs doesn’t bring much change to the environment. Nevertheless, governments and individuals can responsibly work together to eradicate pollution and traffic problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in many cases, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20377358491 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93190791391 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618867924528 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4707238661 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112927658109 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324644469471 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386900849547 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634627442186 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251231381155 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.