In today's society, by the ever-growing population, people have faced a number of problems like traffic congestion and air pollution. While some assert that raising fuel price plays a pivotal role in reducing traffic congestion and other relevant problems, I completely dismiss them as a practical usefulness way and I believe there are plenty of other more effective ways.
The main reason why increased fuel price is considered a negative development is that it makes a short-term measure. Although reducing petrol price might decrease the number of vehicles on the roads, this is a largely wrong decision because it affects not only on the number of motor vehicles but also the other goods like food price. This is also the case when it comes to other aspects of people's lives like public transportation and accommodation. Global conducting research shows the petrol price has a direct impact on houses and accommodation prices in which poor stratum of society would experience economic pressure in wide rate. This causes the increasing price of the rented houses for tenants and even public transportation tickets. These are a couple of reason in which increased the petrol price is became an injudicious decision and this cost should remain intact owing to the mentioned compelling reasons.
However, raising petrol price introduces a level of decline in heavy traffic and its related problems to every society, the most effective and creative decision is investing in alternative fuels o improving public transportation. That is to say, by developing public transportation, citizens will encourage to use it rather than private vehicles and consequently ail pollution will be decreased.
In conclusion, the drawbacks of raising fuel price do not outweigh the advantages and it is a completely injudicious and unwise act in which poor stratum of people fall in harm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 813, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... in which increased the petrol price is became an injudicious decision and this cost s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...transportation, citizens will encourage to use it rather than private vehicles and con...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, so, while, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28762541806 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94184754062 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57525083612 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1378055249 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.727272727 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174215530752 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621647746957 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222585023081 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945786282416 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025028710911 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.