Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant.
I absolutely agree. Governments and large companies should be held accountable for every little thing that's happened and is still currently happening to our environment.
Everything is ultimately in the governments' and large companies' hands. Sure, people sometimes litter, sometimes they smoke, and other times they're throwing stuff in the ocean. Duh! No one's perfect. But at the end of the day, it's not the people throwing plastic into the ocean that is killing all the fish and turtles. It's factories dumping unimaginable amounts of garbage into the ocean, it is all the oil leaks that happen in the ocean as a result of carelessness and equipment breaking down due to neglectful mechanics.
If companies could have just stopped distributing products that are harmful and hazardous for the environment, an unexplainable amount of problems could have been solved already. Governments could also help by cutting off companies that distribute products that are known to be damaging to the environment. They could also place more strict rules and fines over littering and dumping wastes when they could easily just be sent to recycling.
Companies should also start trying to find biodegradable equivalents to their current products, therefore even if people were to litter or if said companies truly needed to dump their leftover waste somewhere, the Earth wouldn't have to endure any harm and could possibly break down the wastes that have been dumped and use it in benefit of the environment.
All in all, I don't think that people could truly change/improve the environment without the government and large companies stepping in. All we can do is protest for change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...held accountable for every little thing thats happened and is still currently happeni...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
..., sometimes they smoke, and other times theyre throwing stuff in the ocean. Duh! No on...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...nes perfect. But at the end of the day, its not the people throwing plastic into th...
^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...eir leftover waste somewhere, the Earth wouldnt have to endure any harm and could possi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...rth wouldnt have to endure any harm and could possibly break down the wastes that have been du...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...it of the environment. All in all, I dont think that people could truly change/im...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21851851852 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.814086163 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.1237584825 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123903417383 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523541122372 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641830928154 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801092225131 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656561030659 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.