Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and
large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been increasing debate globally regarding environmental protection. Some
people assert that only government officials and major companies can influence
environmental related decisions, since individual persons are powerless to make such
decisions. I agree with this viewpoint to a moderate extent.
Government bodies have the power to create and implement policies that can have
widespread influence on a community’s outcomes. For instance, the government in
Japan has imposed strict regulations to prevent overfishing to ensure preservation of
the marine environment. As a result, all Japanese fishermen are obligated to keep to
these rules. Similarly, big companies are also at the optimal position to influence
consumer choices as mass manufacturers of products. As an example, if they chose
to produce products that are environmentally friendly, such as using biodegradable
materials instead of plastic packaging, they can help to reduce waste at a mass level.
These examples illustrate the sphere of influence that government officials and large
companies have to improve our environment.
On the other hand, I feel that every individual is also is capable of making conscious
choice and taking steps to protect our environment. For example, if one chooses to
use recyclable bags instead of disposable plastic bags, he or she can help to save
over 100 plastic bags each year. People socialize often, and can influence others
actions through modelling positive and environmentally conscious behaviours. Even
though these actions may seem insignificant in the short term, the collective efforts
can have a huge influence in time to come.
In conclusion, I agree that the government and big companies exert strong influences
on our environment wellness through executing policies, as well as through the
manufacturing of environmentally friendly consumer products. However, I also
believe that individuals have the capacity to exert personal choices and potentially
influence their friends to protect the environment in the long-term trajectory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 18, column 41, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'socialize'.
Suggestion: often socialize
...over 100 plastic bags each year. People socialize often, and can influence others actions thro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84090909091 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22388537641 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.075107765 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.933333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 26.0 4.38176352705 593% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198445502401 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649963888695 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478083982132 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521186284059 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051836238768 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.